Pastore LLC represents the CEO of a technology company and the company before the Second Circuit in a high-stakes SEC enforcement appeal. The case challenges a Connecticut federal judge’s reliance on post-trial “new facts” to impose a $441,000 judgment, including disgorgement and civil penalties. Pastore, hired after Cozen O’Connor handled the trial, argued that the district court violated the defendant’s constitutional rights by issuing a permanent industry ban and securities law injunction without jury consideration.
The SEC admitted post-trial that it could not identify harmed investors but later produced a declaration claiming 2,967 traders lost $1.69 million—without linking those losses to the alleged fraud. The agency’s shifting position contradicts the Second Circuit’s precedent in SEC v. Govil, which requires demonstrable pecuniary harm for disgorgement. The trial court’s reliance on financier loans, rather than investor losses, further undermines the judgment.
Pastore asserts that the district court’s process deprived the defendants of due process and exceeded its authority. The firm is aggressively challenging the SEC’s approach and seeking to overturn the ruling before the Second Circuit.